Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ernest v. Miller
423 U.S. 893
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1975-10-14
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- narrowing meaning of “lewd, obscene or indecent sexual proposals” to include only “sodomy, indecent exposure or, in the case of sexual proposals addressed to children, to perform some sexual act”
- trustee of creditor's trust in bankrupt corporation surcharged for bookkeeper's defalcations, which trustee negligently failed to discover
- trustee may not delegate duties for which he is responsible
- “[B]y acting in his official capacity the trustee does not incur a personal liability as does the trustee of an express trust.... The bankruptcy trustee acts as the representative of a separate entity, the estate; he obligates this entity. ...”
- fees assessed against trustee of a creditor’s trust
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ernest v. Miller. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 72 opinions
Cir. Ct. City of Richmond, Va., Div. 1. Certiorari denied.