Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ernest v. Miller

423 U.S. 893

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1975-10-14
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • narrowing meaning of “lewd, obscene or indecent sexual proposals” to include only “sodomy, indecent exposure or, in the case of sexual proposals addressed to children, to perform some sexual act”
  • trustee of creditor's trust in bankrupt corporation surcharged for bookkeeper's defalcations, which trustee negligently failed to discover
  • trustee may not delegate duties for which he is responsible
  • “[B]y acting in his official capacity the trustee does not incur a personal liability as does the trustee of an express trust.... The bankruptcy trustee acts as the representative of a separate entity, the estate; he obligates this entity. ...”
  • fees assessed against trustee of a creditor’s trust

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ernest v. Miller. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
72 opinions

Cir. Ct. City of Richmond, Va., Div. 1. Certiorari denied.