Cohen v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.

How later courts describe this case

• holding that primary responsibility rests with “members of the bar”
• "the judge's careful limiting instructions undoubtedly minimized, if they did not eliminate, any unfair prejudice that might have accrued"
• “casual admission of culpability” in no way furthered conspiracy
• "The general rule concerning admissions by silence or acquiescence is well established. When an accusatory statement is made in the defendant's presence and hearing, and he understands and has an opportunity to deny it, the statement and his failure to deny are admissible against him."
• primary responsibility must lie with attorney