Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cangiano v. United States

Cangiano v. United States, 419 U.S. 904 (1974)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-10-21
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • given an adequate administrative record, and in the absence of a prima facie showing of sham and subterfuge, a party seeking review of a ruling made by the Comptroller of the Currency may not depose the Comptroller about his decision
  • applying an identical Plan’s Rule 5(d) unavailability exception

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cangiano v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
33 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certio-rari in this case and summarily reverse the judgment.