Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Wahba v. New York University
419 U.S. 874
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1974-10-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that “burying the facts, or giving them less than significant emphasis” in a proxy statement can deprive shareholders of “full and honest disclosure”
- allowing a shareholder of a corporation which merged with another corporation to bring suit against the two corporations under § 14(e)
- for Rule 10b-5 purposes, merged corporation's shareholders sold their shares in that corporation and purchased shares in acquiring corporation
- “Certainly, it is essential that the recipients of a proxy statement know that a director’s recommendation contained therein is not completely disinterested.”
- Fourteenth Amendment due process violation "comes within Bivens' sweeping approbation of constitutionally-based causes of action."
- "Whether or not the jury misunderstood the charge of the court is not a question to be reexamined after the verdict has been rendered."
- in reviewing district court’s decision, court of appeals not restricted to grounds relied on by lower court
- private university’s administration of public health service grants pursuant to statute does not make the university a federal actor
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wahba v. New York University. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 264 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.