Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Wahba v. New York University

419 U.S. 874

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-10-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that “burying the facts, or giving them less than significant emphasis” in a proxy statement can deprive shareholders of “full and honest disclosure”
  • allowing a shareholder of a corporation which merged with another corporation to bring suit against the two corporations under § 14(e)
  • for Rule 10b-5 purposes, merged corporation's shareholders sold their shares in that corporation and purchased shares in acquiring corporation
  • “Certainly, it is essential that the recipients of a proxy statement know that a director’s recommendation contained therein is not completely disinterested.”
  • Fourteenth Amendment due process violation "comes within Bivens' sweeping approbation of constitutionally-based causes of action."
  • "Whether or not the jury misunderstood the charge of the court is not a question to be reexamined after the verdict has been rendered."
  • in reviewing district court’s decision, court of appeals not restricted to grounds relied on by lower court
  • private university’s administration of public health service grants pursuant to statute does not make the university a federal actor

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wahba v. New York University. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
264 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.