Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ohio Holding Co. v. Masheter

419 U.S. 835

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-10-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • determining that the legislative history of Exemption 7 supports the interpretation that the exemption is not limited to criminal investigations
  • affirming Collyer rule of NLRB deferral to grievance and arbitration procedures
  • not every instance of misconduct warrants a new trial; test is whether misconduct has prejudiced the defendant to the extent he did not receive a fair trial
  • no mistrial warranted when one juror states by affidavit that nine of the jurors expressed opinions as to guilt before the close of the case, given jury’s impartiality evidenced by their request for re-reading of court’s instructions on sole issue in the case
  • jurors discussing case prior to deliberation

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ohio Holding Co. v. Masheter. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
86 opinions

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.