Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Rawls v. Daughters of Charity of Saint Vincent DePaul, Inc.
419 U.S. 1032
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1974-11-25
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- arresting agents told defendant that he was facing severe penalties, that he was his own best lawyer, and that full cooperation would be his best course of action
- finding a confession to be voluntary even where “federal agents had gone beyond simply urging the defendant to cooperate and had promised that he would be released on bail if he confessed.”
- even with additional promise that appellant would be let out on bail, confession still held to be voluntary
- “[A] motion for directed verdict is a prerequisite for relief on a motion for a j.n.o.v. under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b).”
- in the absence of a statutory definition in LHWCA of surviving "wife" the applicable local law supplies the meaning of that term
- “[A] motion for directed verdict is a prerequisite for relief on a motion for -4- a j.n.o.v. under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b).”
- statement that defendant faced heavy penalties and that wisest course was cooperation held permissible
- discussing reasons why defendant should cooperate was not coercive
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rawls v. Daughters of Charity of Saint Vincent DePaul, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 80 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.