Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Rawls v. Daughters of Charity of Saint Vincent DePaul, Inc.

419 U.S. 1032

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-11-25
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • arresting agents told defendant that he was facing severe penalties, that he was his own best lawyer, and that full cooperation would be his best course of action
  • finding a confession to be voluntary even where “federal agents had gone beyond simply urging the defendant to cooperate and had promised that he would be released on bail if he confessed.”
  • even with additional promise that appellant would be let out on bail, confession still held to be voluntary
  • “[A] motion for directed verdict is a prerequisite for relief on a motion for a j.n.o.v. under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b).”
  • in the absence of a statutory definition in LHWCA of surviving "wife" the applicable local law supplies the meaning of that term
  • “[A] motion for directed verdict is a prerequisite for relief on a motion for -4- a j.n.o.v. under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b).”
  • statement that defendant faced heavy penalties and that wisest course was cooperation held permissible
  • discussing reasons why defendant should cooperate was not coercive

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rawls v. Daughters of Charity of Saint Vincent DePaul, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
80 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.