Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States

414 U.S. 910

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1973-10-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • adopting the principles of Rule 10b-5 in determining whether section 14(e) had been violated
  • "These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed "
  • dismissal of indictment proper if government needlessly relied on hearsay as exercise of court's supervisory power
  • in absence of some showing that integrity of grand jury • proceedings has been compromised indictment will not be overturned on appeal
  • mandamus should not be utilized to direct or influence the exercise of discretion of a governmental official
  • “a prerequisite to the remedy of restitution is that a party seeking rescission must return any proceeds he has received from the transaction in order to be placed in status quo ante.”
  • analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b)
  • claims under § 14(e) of the 1934 Act

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
224 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.