Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States
414 U.S. 910
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1973-10-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- adopting the principles of Rule 10b-5 in determining whether section 14(e) had been violated
- "These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed "
- dismissal of indictment proper if government needlessly relied on hearsay as exercise of court's supervisory power
- in absence of some showing that integrity of grand jury • proceedings has been compromised indictment will not be overturned on appeal
- mandamus should not be utilized to direct or influence the exercise of discretion of a governmental official
- “a prerequisite to the remedy of restitution is that a party seeking rescission must return any proceeds he has received from the transaction in order to be placed in status quo ante.”
- analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b)
- claims under § 14(e) of the 1934 Act
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 224 opinions
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.