Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Sharp v. Texas

414 U.S. 1118

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1974-01-07
Topic: general

Appeal from Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sharp v. Texas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Appeal from Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973).

Mr. Justice *1119 Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment of conviction.