Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Schlesinger v. Councilman
Schlesinger v. Councilman, 414 U.S. 1111 (1973)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1973-12-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the district court had the power to adopt a rule establishing a guideline schedule of fees in personal injury actions for seamen
- calculating net equity according to claimants' initial investment in Ponzi scheme and offsetting that number by any phony interest payments received
- affirming refusal to treat individual claims as part of a class action in a proceeding under old Bankruptcy Act and Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C.A. Secs. 78aaa et seq.
- “The district courts’ supervisory jurisdiction over contingent fee contracts for services rendered in cases before them is well-established.”
- an inherent power to set counsel fees in cases involving persons of presumed incapacity
- federal court has supervisory jurisdiction to redetermine contingent fees in admiralty cases
- decision under Securities Investor Protection Act
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schlesinger v. Councilman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 88 opinions
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.