Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Garren v. City of Winston-Salem
Garren v. City of Winston-Salem, 409 U.S. 1039 (1972)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1972-12-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- uncertainty in the law is a factor which normally commends compromise to district court's discretion
- where juror becomes ill after jury deliberations commence, court's first duty is to secure medical assistance notwithstanding statutory provision prohibiting jurors from speaking with non-jurors
- construing TMT in context of settlement of derivative suit
- “in any case there is a range of reasonableness with regard to a settlement — a range which recognizes the uncertainties of law and fact in any particular case and the concomitant risks and costs necessarily inherent in taking any litigation to completion”
- “in any case there is a range of reasonableness with respect to a settlement — a range which recognizes the uncertainties of law and fact in any particular case and the concomitant risks and costs necessarily inherent in taking any litigation to completion”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Garren v. City of Winston-Salem. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 131 opinions
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.