Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Rose v. Bondurant
409 U.S. 1020
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1972-11-20
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- rejecting constitutional arguments attacking the Massachusetts motorcycle helmet law which were virtually identical to those made by the defendant in this case
- due process is not judicial process; an administrative hearing with rudiments of fair play at law is adequate
- upholding state mandatory helmet law for motorcyclists
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rose v. Bondurant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 84 opinions
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. M.
Mr. Justice Stewart would vacate judgment and remand case to determine whether case has become moot.