Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Doherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
406 U.S. 932
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1972-05-15
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
How later courts describe this case
- stating that “[i]t is also permissible for a jury, as here, to render a partial verdict; a court may accept a jury’s verdict as to one count and declare a mistrial as to another upon which no agreement has been reached”
- trial court returned the jury to jury room to write out a verdict on one count of the indictment to which they had agreed
- manipulation is “the creation of an artificial price by planned action, whether by one man or a group of men”
- Courts should defer to union’s interpretation of the constitution unless it is not fair and reasonable.
- task of defining manipulation or attempted manipulation “has fallen to case-by-case judicial development”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Doherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 104 opinions
Ct. App. D. C. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Cer-tiorari denied.