Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Barden v. Junior College District No. 520

406 U.S. 920

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-05-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • cash from second mortgage on residence to meet payments on investment property is not consumer transaction
  • where transaction was for a business purpose, statute providing for right of rescission was not applicable, even though mortgage was placed on property
  • cash from second mortgage on personal residence to meet payments on rental property is a commercial transaction
  • truck purchase for personal as well as business use is a consumer credit transaction
  • cash used to make payments on an investment property is not a consumer loan
  • crew member aboard vessel was crushed when operator of a platform crane lost control of a welding machine; indemnify agreement did not contemplate this type of injury caused during unloading
  • mortgage placed on debtor’s own residence in order to avoid foreclosure on rental property they owned was not consumer transaction but was to extend a past due obligation on investment property and hence was commercial

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Barden v. Junior College District No. 520. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
97 opinions

App. Ct. Ill. 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.