Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Carter v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
Carter v. Conn. Mut. Life Ins., 404 U.S. 857 (1971)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1971-10-12
- Topic
- estate-planning
How later courts describe this case
- rejecting equal protection challenge to requirement that county’s grand jurors be at least 35 years of age
- exclusion of jurors below the age of 35 justified on the ground that the state can take advantage of older persons’ greater experience; pre-Duren
- practice of excluding welfare recipients from jury service had no statutory basis and was terminated
- county’s voluntary jury selection system did not violate constitutional rights
- breach of contract and tortious injury to business
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carter v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 89 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.