Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
New York Times Co. v. United States
403 U.S. 944
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1971-06-26
- Topic
- antitrust
How later courts describe this case
- denying a motion to close even a portion of the argument in the Pentagon Papers case
- miscellaneous order denying a motion by the United States for in camera oral argument, with three Justices voting to grant the motion
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed New York Times Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The Chief Justice announced in open Court that the Government’s motion to conduct part of oral arguments involving security matters in camera denied and under order granting writ counsel may submit arguments in writing under seal in lieu of in camera oral argument.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant limited in camera argument.Two hours allowed for oral argument.