Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley

400 U.S. 949

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1970-12-07
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • Refusal to bargain, loss of benefits that might have been gained by employees in negotiated agreement
  • Corps required to prepare project-wide EIS now because both Congress and the Secretary of Transportation later will have to approve other portions of the state expressway project
  • in trial for assaulting a police officer, evidence that defendant's driver's license had been revoked was admissible to show motive for resistance when officer stopped defendant and asked to see his license
  • sections 9 & 10 of the Refuse Act, 33 U.S.C. §§401 & 403
  • district court has power to set aside agency action in excess of statutory authority
  • statement that some of the participants in the crime were at a house in Jersey City didn’t incriminate Ba-glino, who testified, in response to a question from his own lawyer, that he lived in Jersey City
  • similar provision under the Department of Transportation Act
  • enlarging reinstatement rights of economic strikers

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
192 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr.. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Black-, mun are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Reported below: 425 F. 2d 97.