Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Hacker v. District Court of Sedgwick County

393 U.S. 1098

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1969-02-24
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • recognizing that under certain circumstances it may be necessary, as a matter of law, to repeat Miranda warnings despite their prior administration
  • a defendant who exercises his right to a jury and incurs a sentence he otherwise would not have received has standing under Jackson
  • explicit waiver of objection by trial counsel for tactical reasons
  • criteria for reviewing admission of similar transactions

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hacker v. District Court of Sedgwick County. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
70 opinions

Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.