Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Pritchard

386 U.S. 1009

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-04-17
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • warranty of fitness for use and negligent failure to warn, under Pennsylvania law
  • “The correct test is whether a warrant if sought could have been obtained by law enforcement agency application which disclosed its corporate information, not whether any one particular officer could have obtained it on what information he individually possessed.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Pritchard. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
120 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.