Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Carr v. City of Altus

Carr v. City of Altus, 385 U.S. 35 (1966)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1966-11-07
Topic: general

Per Curiam. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carr v. City of Altus. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

CARRv. CITY OF ALTUS,385 U.S. 35(1966)

CARRv. CITY OF ALTUS ET AL.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN

DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

No. 481.

Decided November 7, 1966.

255 F. Supp. 828, affirmed.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas,pro se,Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General,T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, andJ. Arthur Sandlin, George C. Black, Jr., andRoger Tyler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.A. W. Walker, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.Page 36