Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

A. P. Smith Manufacturing Co. v. United States

385 U.S. 1003

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-01-09
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that “overriding purpose” of § 16(b) is to make it “unprofitable for insiders to engage in short-swing speculation.”
  • conversion of preferred stock into common stock found not to constitute a sale of the preferred stock
  • “[W]hen proof establishes a factual situation which would just as well justify defendants’ conduct as to lead to an inference of conspiracy, then plaintiff has failed to carry her burden.”
  • appellants as private persons were incapable of violating the substantive statute requiring action under “color of law,” but they could be found guilty of aiding and abetting a violation of that statute by an individual acting under “color of law”
  • teacher may not be terminated without due process
  • Id. teacher whose contract was not renewed
  • Certified drug MER-29 proves to cause cataracts.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed A. P. Smith Manufacturing Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
197 opinions

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.