Mack v. Brenner

How later courts describe this case

• reversing a district court order for a new trial and noting, “[o]nce the case went to the jury, its verdict should not have been upset, if reasonable men could find in defendant’s favor, as they certainly could here.”
• "[o]nce the case went to the jury, its verdict should not have been upset, if reasonable men could find [as the jury did]"
• application of collateral estoppel denied where defendant did not appeal an adverse judgment awarding damages of $35,000 and defendant was later sued for over $7 million
• non-patent; a multi-victim accident litigation