Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McKinnie v. Tennessee
380 U.S. 449
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1965-04-05
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKinnie v. Tennessee. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U. S. 306.
Mr. Justice Stewart would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 326.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 318, 322, 327.