Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States
379 U.S. 951
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-12-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- affirming dismissal of air traffic controller based on pre-employment conduct including homosexual activity and smoking of marijuana
- Air Force Command's designation of permissible flying areas, although an unreviewable 'discretionary' determination had regulations been complied with, held removed from 2680(a
- while military authorities may have absolute discretion concerning when and where to fly, officer liable for negligently failing to warn civilian aviation
- civilian passengers recover, servicemen passengers do not when an Air Force plane negligently hits a commercial airliner
- suit not barred where air controllers negligently fail to warn airline of hazardous flight training near airplane’s route
- pro rata will continue to mean "in numerical shares or proportions based on the number of tortfeasors"
- Air Force Command’s designation of permissible flying areas, although an unreviewable “discretionary” determination had regulations been complied with, held removed from § 2680(a) exception by Command’s failure to make prior study required by regulation
- federal law governs finality of judgment for res judicata purposes
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 207 opinions
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.