Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co.
377 U.S. 934
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-05-18
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- taking the position that abstention is proper due solely to the difficulty of the state law question
- 'Glidden, whose effective life was short, has proven to be, under sound law, an unsafe guide and a dim beacon'
- "[W]here litigants have once battled for the court's decision, they should neither be required, nor without good reason permitted, to battle for it again."
- "the `law of the case' does not rigidly bind a court to its former decisions, but is only addressed to its good sense"
- government had right to appeal trial court's suppression order in earlier, aborted prosecution
- “ ‘Finality’ ... may mean little more than that the litigation of a particular issue has reached such a stage that a court sees no really good reason for permitting it to be litigated again.”
- decision stayed until state court ruled on area of unclear state law
- an appeal is to be determined upon the record below
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 274 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.