Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Georgia v. United States

356 U.S. 273

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1958-04-14
Topic: litigation

Per Curiam. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Georgia v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

GEORGIAv. UNITED STATES,356 U.S. 273(1958)

GEORGIA ET AL.v. UNITED STATES ET AL.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

GEORGIA.

No. 774.

Decided April 14, 1958.

156 F. Supp. 711, affirmed.

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia,E. FreemanLeverett, Assistant Attorney General,W.H. Swiggart,E. R. Leigh, Joseph L. LenihanandW.L. Grubbsfor appellants.Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney GeneralHansen, Robert W. Ginnane, Samuel R. HowellandIsaacK. Hayfor the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, andHenry L. Walker, Arthur J.DixonandJames A. Bistlinefor the Southern Railway Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.Page 274