Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Wilson
344 U.S. 923
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1953-02-02
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Per Curiam: The judgments are affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Burton dissent. Mr.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Wilson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Per Curiam:
The judgments are affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Burton dissent. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. Philip B. Perlman, then Solicitor General, was on the Statements as to Jurisdiction. Selden S. McNeer argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was Hobart L. McKeever.