Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cady v. Georgia

323 U.S. 676

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1944-11-20
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a); *677United States Supreme Court Rule 9; Flournoy v. Wiener, 321 U. S. 253, 259, and cases cited; Seaboard Air Line R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cady v. Georgia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a); *677 United States Supreme Court Rule 9; Flournoy v. Wiener, 321 U. S. 253, 259, and cases cited; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Watson, 287 U. S. 86, 91. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Harry M. Wilson for appellant. Messrs. T. Grady Head, Attorney General of Georgia, and Victor Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.