Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.
Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd. v. Auto. Maint. Mach. Co., 315 U.S. 282 (1942)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1942-02-16
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U. S. 584; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U. S. 584; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 312 U. S. 660. The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to enforce the Board’s order in full, but with the modification proposed by the Board to conform to the decision in Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board, 311 U. S. *283 7. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Roberts are of opinion that the order as modified should be enforced except with respect to the alleged discriminatory discharges of Warner, Jr., and Jordan, which they think are without the support of substantial evidence.
Reversed.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.