Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Moon v. Jones

309 U.S. 640

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1940-04-22
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Bell’s Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 *641U. S. 232, 237; Northwestern Life Ins.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moon v. Jones. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam:

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Bell’s Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 *641 U. S. 232, 237; Northwestern Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U. S. 132, 138-139; Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 513-514.

Messrs. Seth T. Cole, Martin Saxe, Edward F. Colladay, and S. F. Colladay for appellant in No. 838. Messrs. James A. Davis and Leon Quat for appellant in No. 862. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Henry E-pstein, Solicitor General, and Jack Goodman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.