Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

South Bend v. DeHaven

S. Bend v. DeHaven, 302 U.S. 644 (1937)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1937-10-25
Topic
general

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Indiana. Per Curiam: The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed South Bend v. DeHaven. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Indiana.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640. (2) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; City of Holton v. Kansas State Bank, 300 U. S. 641.