Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lauro v. Barker

Lauro v. Barker, 299 U.S. 521 (1937)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1937-01-18
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) Bellingham Bay Co. *522v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lauro v. Barker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) Bellingham Bay Co. *522 v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 81; Wick v. Chelan Electric Co., 280 U. S. 108, 110, 111. (2) Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co., 109 U. S. 401.

Mr. Henry N. Rapaport, with whom Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport and Robert S. Garson were on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan, and Maurice Finkelstein were on the brief for appellees.