Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Purcell v. New York Central R.

Purcell v. N.Y. Cent. R., 296 U.S. 545 (1935)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1935-11-11
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The motion for leave to file statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The. appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly'presented *546federal question. Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; Henkel v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Purcell v. New York Central R.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The. appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly'presented *546 federal question. Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; Henkel v. Cincinnati, 177 U. S. 170; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Duvall, 225 U. S. 477, 481; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192, 193-194; Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, ante, p. 535. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Messrs. T. J. Johnston and Irving I. Goldsmith for appellant. Mr. Charles E. Nichols for appellee.