Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

General Construction Co. v. Fisher

Gen. Constr. Co. v. Fisher, 295 U.S. 715 (1935)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1935-04-08
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Trinityfarm Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed General Construction Co. v. Fisher. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Trinityfarm Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514; Lucas v. Howard, 280 U. S. 526; Lucas v. Reed, 281 U. S. 699; Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 514; Willcuts v. Bunn, 282 U. S. 224, et seq.; Baltimore Shipbuilding Co. v. Baltimore, 195 U. S. 375, 382.