Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Columbia-Deschutes Power Co. v. Stricklin, State Engineer
290 U.S. 590
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1933-10-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “wasteful application of water, even though a useful project, * * * is not included in the term ‘use’ as contemplated by the law of waters”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Columbia-Deschutes Power Co. v. Stricklin, State Engineer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that the application for allowance of the appeal was not made within the time provided by law. Section 8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925 (c. 229,43 Stat. 936, 940; U.S. Code, Title 28, § 350).