Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Glenn v. Doyal

Glenn v. Doyal, 285 U.S. 526 (1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1932-03-21
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Glenn v. Doyal. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 10 opinions

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U. S. 222, 226; Iowa Central Ry. *527 Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Lombard v. West Chicago Park Commissioners, 181 U. S. 33, 42, 43; French v. Taylor, 199 U. S. 274, 277; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638, 639, 640; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 294; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669, 670; St. Louis Land Co. v. Kansas City, 241 U. S. 419, 427; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Sandel v. South Carolina, 269 U. S. 532; Boyd v. Smythe, 270 U. S. 635.

Mr. John A. Sibley, with whom Messrs. Marion Smith and Herman Swift were on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. George M. Napier, Attorney General of Georgia, Orville A. Park, and John A. Smith were on the brief for appellee.