Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Walnut & Quince Streets Corp. v. Mills

284 U.S. 573

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1931-10-19
Topic
general

*Per Curiam: The appeal herein 'is' dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Walnut & Quince Streets Corp. v. Mills. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*Per Curiam:

The appeal herein 'is' dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.