Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

283 U.S. 808

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1931-05-25
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed. The order of the District Court merely reinstated the interlocutory injunction pursuant to the opinion of this Court. The *809parties should proceed with the trial of the cause upon the merits as this Court has directed. Messrs. Oscar E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
17 opinions
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed. The order of the District Court merely reinstated the interlocutory injunction pursuant to the opinion of this Court. The *809 parties should proceed with the trial of the cause upon the merits as this Court has directed.

Messrs. Oscar E. Carlstrom, Samuel A. Ettelson, George I. Haight, Benjamin F. Goldstein, Edmund D. Adcock, and Francis X. Busch for appellants. Messrs. Horace Kent Tenney, Charles M. Bracelen, William H. Thompson, Kenneth F. Burgess, R. A. Van Orsdel, and Leslie N. Jones for appellee. [See 282 U. S. 133.]