Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission
Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co. v. R.R. Comm’n, 283 U.S. 787 (1931)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1931-03-16
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: In view of the findings of fact by the state court, supported by the evidence, the judgment is affirmed. Portland Railway Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Oregon, 229 U. S. 397, 412; Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
In view of the findings of fact by the state court, supported by the evidence, the judgment is affirmed. Portland Railway Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Oregon, 229 U. S. 397, 412; Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U. S. 236, 243, 244; Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. North Dakota, 236 U. S. 585, 593.
Messrs. John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Herbert H. Naujoks, Assistant Attorney General, and H. A. Minaban were on the brief for appellee.