Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

David v. Hubbard

280 U.S. 514

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1929-10-14
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The motions for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis are denied. The Court has examined the unprinted records submitted in support of the petitions for certiorari and finds that the attacks upon the action of the court below are without any substantial merit. For this-reason the petitions for writs of certiorari are denied, and the clerk is directed to *515enter the usual order with respect to the payment of costs already incurred, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926. Mr. Elwood G.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed David v. Hubbard. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis are denied. The Court has examined the unprinted records submitted in support of the petitions for certiorari and finds that the attacks upon the action of the court below are without any substantial merit. For this-reason the petitions for writs of certiorari are denied, and the clerk is directed to *515 enter the usual order with respect to the payment of costs already incurred, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Mr. Elwood G. Hubert for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.