Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner

Atl. Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner, 278 U.S. 565 (1928)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1928-10-29
Topic
general

Per Curiam: Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the authority of (1) Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. v. Coogan, 271 U. S. 472; (2) Southern Pacific Co. v. Berkshire, 254 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
Per Curiam:

Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the authority of (1) Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. v. Coogan, 271 U. S. 472; (2) Southern Pacific Co. v. Berkshire, 254 U. S. 415; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. Leitch, 276 U. S. 429; (3) Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. v. Moser, 275 U. S. 133.