Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.
258 U.S. 604
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1922-03-13
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam,. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394, 397; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon; point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618.