Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Moore v. Olsness

245 U.S. 627

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1917-11-05
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moore v. Olsness. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
12 opinions
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (2) Butler v. *628 Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402, 415, 416; Newton v. Commissioners, 100 U. S. 548, 559; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; (3) Railroad Company v. County of Otoe, 16 Wall. 667, 676; Kies v. Lowrey, 199 U. S. 233; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175.

Mr. Aubrey Lawreftce for plaintiff in error. Mr. William Langer for defendants in error.