Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lincoln v. Power

241 U.S. 651

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1916-05-01
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; *652Bryant v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lincoln v. Power. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; *652 Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31.

Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles" Fox for the appellees.