Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pfaelzer v. Bach Fur Co.

215 U.S. 584

Per Curiam. Writ of error dismissed for want of final judgment. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pfaelzer v. Bach Fur Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PFAELZERv. BACH FUR COMPANY,215 U.S. 584(1909)

PFAELZERv. BACH FUR COMPANY.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

NEW YORK.

No. 290.

Submitted November 1, 1909.

Decided November 8, 1909.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States dismissed for want of final judgment on the authority ofMcLishv.Roff,141 U.S. 661.¹

Mr. A.S. Gilbertfor plaintiff in error.Mr. Benjamin N. Cardozofor defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of final judgment.McLishv.Roff,141 U.S. 661.

Page 584 The headnote inMcLishv.Roffis as follows:

Under § 5 of the act of March 3, 1891, c. 517,26 Stat. 826, "to establish Circuit Courts of Appeal," etc., the appeal or writ of error which may be taken "from the existing Circuit Courts direct to the Supreme Court," "in any case in which the jurisdiction of the court is in issue," can be taken only after final judgment; when the party against whom it is rendered must elect whether he will take his writ of error or appeal to this court upon the question of jurisdiction alone, or to the Circuit Court of Appeals upon the whole case. ↩