Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Shaw v. United States

Shaw v. United States, 212 U.S. 559 (1908)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1908-11-30
Topic: commercial

Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Shaw v. United States, 141 Fed. Rep. 469; United States v. Shaw, 144 Fed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Shaw v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

SHAWv. UNITED STATES,212 U.S. 559(1908)

SHAWv. UNITED STATES.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

OF NEW YORK.

No. 426.

Motion to dismiss or affirm. — Submitted November 16, 1908.

Decided November 30, 1908.

American Sugar Refining Co. v.United States,211 U.S. 155, which held that a direct appeal from the Circuit Court would not lie in a casePage 560where the only real substantial point was whether an officer of the United States had misconstrued the tariff act of 1897, followed, and appeal dismissed. Writ of error to reverse 141 F. 469, dismissed.

The Attorney GeneralandThe Solicitor Generalfor the appellee in support of the motion.Mr. Edward S. Hatch, for the appellant, in opposition to the motion.

Per Curiam:

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.Shawv.United States, 141 F. 469;United Statesv.Shaw, 144 F. 329, and opinion of Board of General Appraisers,Shawv.United States,203 U.S. 591;American Sugar Refining Companyv.United States, decided to-day,211 U.S. 155.