Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

National Accident Society v. Spiro

Nat’l Accident Soc’y v. Spiro, 164 U.S. 281 (1896)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1896-11-30
Topic
general

The Chief Justice : This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth- Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question: “ Does a defendant by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, thereby waive objection to the jurisdiction of the court for' want of' sufficient service of the summons ? ” For the reasons given and on the authorities cited in the case of Wabash Western Railway v. Brow, ante, 271, the question must be answered in the negative. Certificate accordingly. Mr. Justice Brewer and Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Accident Society v. Spiro. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
12 opinions
The Chief Justice :

This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth- Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question:

“ Does a defendant by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, thereby waive objection to the jurisdiction of the court for' want of' sufficient service of the summons ? ”

For the reasons given and on the authorities cited in the case of Wabash Western Railway v. Brow, ante, 271, the question must be answered in the negative.

Certificate accordingly.

Mr. Justice Brewer and Mr. Justice Peokham dissented.