Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Churchill v. Utica

Churchill v. Utica, 154 U.S. 550 (1866)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1866-03-26
Topic
general

Mr. Justice Nelson delivered the opinion of the court. Mr. W. M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Churchill v. Utica. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Mr. Justice Nelson

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mr. W. M. Evarts, Mr. C. B. Sedgwick and Messrs. Edmonds & Miller for plaintiff in error. Mr. F. Kernan for defendant in error.

Churchill is the only party against whom judgment was rendered in the court below, and the party who has brought a writ of error to this court.

The judgment is reversed, and the case remitted to the court below for proceedings there as directed in the case of Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573. We refer to the opinion in that case as governing this one. Reversed.