Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

In Re Huntington

137 U.S. 63

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1890-11-03
Topic
general

Per Curiam: Petitioner alleges that he is detained by the United States marshal for the Southern District of New York, by virtue of an order purporting to be an order of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The motion for leave to file a petition for the writ of habeas corpus is denied upon the authority of Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584, and cases cited. Denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Huntington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
Per Curiam:

Petitioner alleges that he is detained by the United States marshal for the Southern District of New York, by virtue of an order purporting to be an order of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The motion for leave to file a petition for the writ of habeas corpus is denied upon the authority of Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584, and cases cited.

Denied.