Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia

137 U.S. 62

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1890-10-27
Topic
general

Per Curiam: This is an appeal from the decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissing the bill of *63 complaint filed by appellant therein, the object of the bill having been to restrain the defendants from selling, or attempting to sell, certain property of complainant, on account of certain assessments for street improvements, and also to cancel and annul two tax lien certificates therein named,; and counsel for appellant having stated in open court that such assessments and lien certificates have been, pending this appeal, quashed and annulled at law by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, and that only the disposition of costs is involved herein, it is ordered that said appeal be Mr. William Birney for appellant. Mr. George G. Hazelton and Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
28 opinions
Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from the decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissing the bill of *63 complaint filed by appellant therein, the object of the bill having been to restrain the defendants from selling, or attempting to sell, certain property of complainant, on account of certain assessments for street improvements, and also to cancel and annul two tax lien certificates therein named,; and counsel for appellant having stated in open court that such assessments and lien certificates have been, pending this appeal, quashed and annulled at law by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, and that only the disposition of costs is involved herein, it is ordered that said appeal be

Mr. William Birney for appellant. Mr. George G. Hazelton and Mr. S. T. Thomas for appellee.

Dismissed without costs to either party.