Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.
Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Ry. Co., 112 U.S. 33 (1884)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1884-10-27
- Topic
- general
*36 Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court. He stated the facts in the.foregoing language and continued : • ■ ’ The judgment "below was clearly right. The Columbus, Chicago &, Indiana Central Company was, in equity, the owner of the property when the lease was made and when the Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Company went into possession under it.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
delivered the opinion of the court. He stated the facts in the.foregoing language and continued : •
■ ’ The judgment "below was clearly right. The Columbus, Chicago &, Indiana Central Company was, in equity, the owner of the property when the lease was made and when the Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Company went into possession under it. The deed executed in February, 1872, pursuant to the contract of purchase, converted the equitable title of the Columbus, Chicago & Indiana Central Company into a legal title, which at once, by operation of law, inured to the benefit of the Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Company under .its lease. All the rights of William B. Skidmore, as against1 the property, accrued long after those of tho Pitts-burg, Cincinnati &. St. Louis Company and are subject to tho title of that company. Such being the case, it is entirely unnecessary to inquire whether the Skidmores acquired a valid title to the property as against the Columbus, Chicago & Indiana Central Company. The Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Company is entitled to the possession, whether that title be good or bad.
The judgment is affirmed.